Integrity Focus
Menu
Recent ICAC Cases Anti-Corruption Laws in Hong Kong Corruption Myths Cross-Boundary Business Operations Conflict of Interest
What is conflict of interest? Examples of conflict of interest Problems arising from conflict of interest How to handle conflict of interest? How well are we managing conflict of interest?
Ethical Decision MakingRecent ICAC Cases
10
Jun 2025Ex-manager of beverage company charged by ICAC gets 33 months’ jail for concealing conflicting interest in $1.9m ads, crime proceeds confiscatedA former marketing manager of a beverage company, charged by the ICAC and convicted after trial, was sentenced to 33 months’ imprisonment today (June 10) at the District Court for deceiving the company into awarding various outdoor advertisement purchase orders worth totalling about $1.9 million by concealing his control of a vendor, and conspiring with a subordinate to use false quotations and inspection reports to mislead the company. The convicted defendant was confiscated $600,000 in crime proceeds.Chan Wing-fung, 41, former manager of marketing department of Vitasoy International Holdings Limited (Vitasoy), was earlier found guilty after trial of three charges – two of conspiracy for agents to use documents with intent to deceive his principal, contrary to section 9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance; and one of fraud, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance.In sentencing, Deputy Judge Ms Ivy Chui Yee-mei reprimanded Chan for committing a premeditated crime and intentionally failing to declare his conflict of interest to the company. The Judge added that in the present case which spanned over three and a half years, Chan immediately undermined company interest for personal gain of over $600,000, warranting a custodial sentence.The Judge today allowed the prosecution’s application in relation to one of the charges and ordered to confiscate crime proceeds of $600,000 of Chan, being the profits he made in the present case. Chan was ordered to satisfy the confiscation order within six months, failing which he will have to serve an additional term of imprisonment of 19 months.Co-defendant Keung Tze-ping, 50, former outdoor visibility officer of marketing department of Vitasoy, earlier pleaded guilty to the two counts of conspiracy for agents to use documents with intent to deceive her principal. She was today given a jail term of nine months, suspended for two years.Among other duties at the material time, Chan was responsible for approving the engagement of vendors for the merchandising team and outdoor advertising team of Vitasoy’s marketing department while Keung would assist Chan to obtain quotations from vendors. They were required to obtain at least two or three quotations, subject to the amount of a procurement exercise involved. As stipulated in the staff handbook of Vitasoy, all staff members were required to disclose any possible conflict of interest to Vitasoy and seek permission in writing prior to participating in any business which would possibly cause a conflict of interest.The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint filed by Vitasoy following an internal audit conducted by the company. Enquiries revealed that in January 2016, Chan instructed his girlfriend to establish Why Creative Graphic Design House (Why Creative) to take up the orders from Vitasoy. Chan had never declared to Vitasoy his interest in Why Creative despite the fact that Why Creative was controlled by him.Between January 2016 and early October 2019, Chan awarded 39 outdoor advertisement purchase orders of Vitasoy which worth totalling about $1.9 million to Why Creative. Chan’s girlfriend transferred 40 per cent of the profit totalling over $600,000 to Chan according to their agreement.The court also heard that Chan had approved to pay a monthly fee of $36,000 to a vendor without the authorisation of his supervisor, falsely claiming that that the inspections were arranged on Vitasoy’s outdoor advertisements.When being asked by Vitasoy to submit the relevant quotations of the three vendors, including Why Creative, and the inspection reports, Chan conspired with subordinates, including Keung, to forge 30 sets of quotation documents purportedly issued by four vendors for Vitasoy’s examination, so as to mislead the company that the procurements had complied with the relevant policy. Meanwhile, they fabricated 38 sets of outdoor advertisement inspection reports to mislead Vitasoy that inspections were completed by the relevant vendor.ICAC investigation revealed that the four vendors had never issued the quotations concerned and the relevant vendor had not conducted the inspections mentioned in the inspection reports.Vitasoy has rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Sabrina See, assisted by ICAC officer Leo Fung. 10
Jun 2025Ten months’ jail for then company manager charged by ICAC for soliciting $3m bribe from business partner over dispute resolutionA then manager of a company, charged by the ICAC and convicted after trial of soliciting a bribe of $2 million to $3 million from a business partner for assisting the latter to resolve a business dispute between the two companies on terms most favourable to the partner, was today (June 10) sentenced to 10 months’ imprisonment at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts.Wang Wenning, 65, then manager of China Coal Hong Kong Limited (CCHK, formerly known as Double Resources Limited), was earlier found guilty of one count of agent soliciting an advantage, contrary to section 9(1)(b) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.In sentencing, Magistrate Miss Minnie Wat Lai-man reprimanded the defendant for abusing his official capacity to solicit bribe money. She noted that corruption was a serious crime warranting a deterrent sentence, and imposed an immediate custodial sentence on the defendant.The court heard that in 1994, the parent company of CCHK and a business partner jointly invested in a property development project and capital injection was made by CCHK. CCHK subsequently intended to withdraw some of the investment fund from the project but the two parties failed to reach a final agreement. Since 2018, CCHK and the business partner had a dispute over the project. The defendant was assigned to resolve the dispute.The defendant subsequently arranged a one-on-one meeting with a director-cum-shareholder of the business partner. During the meeting, the defendant told the director-cum-shareholder that he was in urgent need of money for his personal financial problem, and solicited from the latter a bribe between $2 million and $3 million. The defendant claimed that he would assist the director-cum-shareholder to resolve the dispute on terms and conditions most favourable to him, but his solicitation was rejected.…/2CCHK prohibits its employees from soliciting or accepting advantages from others in relation to CCHK’s affairs and business.CCHK and the business partner concerned rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Marc Corlett, assisted by ICAC officer Swing Chan. 09
Jun 2025Three months’ jail for foreman of airport expansion works subcontractor charged by ICAC for soliciting and accepting bribes from bar-bendersA foreman of a subcontractor of the Terminal 2 expansion works of the Hong Kong International Airport, charged by the ICAC, was today (June 9) sentenced to three months’ imprisonment at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts for soliciting and accepting bribes totalling about $16,000 from three bar-benders for assisting them to continue their employment and assigning overtime work to one of them to earn extra payments.Ko Chun-yin, 31, then foreman of Ho Chau & Sons (HK) Engineering Limited (HCL), was sentenced to a jail term of three months and ordered to repay his then employer over $12,000 in restitution, equivalent to the amount of bribes involved in the present case.The defendant earlier pleaded guilty to two counts of agent soliciting an advantage and six counts of agent accepting an advantage, contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.In sentencing, Magistrate Mr Gary Chu Man-hon noted that the offences in the present case were serious in nature that they came as a blow to the local labour market, lowered workers’ morale and undermined Hong Kong’s clean reputation. The court had to send out a clear message to the public that the corrupt deserved severe punishment. The magistrate took a starting point of six months’ imprisonment and reduced the jail term of the defendant to three months having considered his guilty plea and immediate full restitution of the bribes concerned.The court heard that HCL was a subcontractor of the Terminal 2 expansion works of the Hong Kong International Airport at the material time. The defendant was a foreman of HCL responsible for leading a team of bar-benders and assigning work to them. Should workers be required to work overtime, they would be paid 1.5 to two times of the standard hourly rate. HCL prohibited its employees from soliciting or accepting any advantages from others in relation to its business and affairs.Between April 2022 and February 2023, the defendant had respectively solicited from three bar-benders bribes of $100 per working day or an unspecified amount of “tea money” for assisting them to continue their employment with HCL. During the period, the defendant had eventually accepted bribes totalling $6,800 from the trio.The defendant had also solicited from one of the bar-benders bribes of $200 per working day for arranging him to perform overtime work to earn extra payments.The bar-bender reluctantly paid bribes totalling about $6,000 to the defendant for his overtime work on 30 working days.The ICAC investigation stemmed from a corruption complaint. Enquiries revealed that the workers believed that the defendant had the authority to dismiss them. The trio reluctantly paid bribes to the defendant as they worried about losing their jobs. One of the workers was dismissed on the spot after he refused to pay a bribe of $3,000 solicited by the defendant.HCL rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by ICAC officer Moon Leung.
Jun 2025Ex-manager of beverage company charged by ICAC gets 33 months’ jail for concealing conflicting interest in $1.9m ads, crime proceeds confiscatedA former marketing manager of a beverage company, charged by the ICAC and convicted after trial, was sentenced to 33 months’ imprisonment today (June 10) at the District Court for deceiving the company into awarding various outdoor advertisement purchase orders worth totalling about $1.9 million by concealing his control of a vendor, and conspiring with a subordinate to use false quotations and inspection reports to mislead the company. The convicted defendant was confiscated $600,000 in crime proceeds.Chan Wing-fung, 41, former manager of marketing department of Vitasoy International Holdings Limited (Vitasoy), was earlier found guilty after trial of three charges – two of conspiracy for agents to use documents with intent to deceive his principal, contrary to section 9(3) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and section 159A of the Crimes Ordinance; and one of fraud, contrary to section 16A of the Theft Ordinance.In sentencing, Deputy Judge Ms Ivy Chui Yee-mei reprimanded Chan for committing a premeditated crime and intentionally failing to declare his conflict of interest to the company. The Judge added that in the present case which spanned over three and a half years, Chan immediately undermined company interest for personal gain of over $600,000, warranting a custodial sentence.The Judge today allowed the prosecution’s application in relation to one of the charges and ordered to confiscate crime proceeds of $600,000 of Chan, being the profits he made in the present case. Chan was ordered to satisfy the confiscation order within six months, failing which he will have to serve an additional term of imprisonment of 19 months.Co-defendant Keung Tze-ping, 50, former outdoor visibility officer of marketing department of Vitasoy, earlier pleaded guilty to the two counts of conspiracy for agents to use documents with intent to deceive her principal. She was today given a jail term of nine months, suspended for two years.Among other duties at the material time, Chan was responsible for approving the engagement of vendors for the merchandising team and outdoor advertising team of Vitasoy’s marketing department while Keung would assist Chan to obtain quotations from vendors. They were required to obtain at least two or three quotations, subject to the amount of a procurement exercise involved. As stipulated in the staff handbook of Vitasoy, all staff members were required to disclose any possible conflict of interest to Vitasoy and seek permission in writing prior to participating in any business which would possibly cause a conflict of interest.The ICAC investigation arose from a corruption complaint filed by Vitasoy following an internal audit conducted by the company. Enquiries revealed that in January 2016, Chan instructed his girlfriend to establish Why Creative Graphic Design House (Why Creative) to take up the orders from Vitasoy. Chan had never declared to Vitasoy his interest in Why Creative despite the fact that Why Creative was controlled by him.Between January 2016 and early October 2019, Chan awarded 39 outdoor advertisement purchase orders of Vitasoy which worth totalling about $1.9 million to Why Creative. Chan’s girlfriend transferred 40 per cent of the profit totalling over $600,000 to Chan according to their agreement.The court also heard that Chan had approved to pay a monthly fee of $36,000 to a vendor without the authorisation of his supervisor, falsely claiming that that the inspections were arranged on Vitasoy’s outdoor advertisements.When being asked by Vitasoy to submit the relevant quotations of the three vendors, including Why Creative, and the inspection reports, Chan conspired with subordinates, including Keung, to forge 30 sets of quotation documents purportedly issued by four vendors for Vitasoy’s examination, so as to mislead the company that the procurements had complied with the relevant policy. Meanwhile, they fabricated 38 sets of outdoor advertisement inspection reports to mislead Vitasoy that inspections were completed by the relevant vendor.ICAC investigation revealed that the four vendors had never issued the quotations concerned and the relevant vendor had not conducted the inspections mentioned in the inspection reports.Vitasoy has rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Sabrina See, assisted by ICAC officer Leo Fung. 10
Jun 2025Ten months’ jail for then company manager charged by ICAC for soliciting $3m bribe from business partner over dispute resolutionA then manager of a company, charged by the ICAC and convicted after trial of soliciting a bribe of $2 million to $3 million from a business partner for assisting the latter to resolve a business dispute between the two companies on terms most favourable to the partner, was today (June 10) sentenced to 10 months’ imprisonment at the Eastern Magistrates’ Courts.Wang Wenning, 65, then manager of China Coal Hong Kong Limited (CCHK, formerly known as Double Resources Limited), was earlier found guilty of one count of agent soliciting an advantage, contrary to section 9(1)(b) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.In sentencing, Magistrate Miss Minnie Wat Lai-man reprimanded the defendant for abusing his official capacity to solicit bribe money. She noted that corruption was a serious crime warranting a deterrent sentence, and imposed an immediate custodial sentence on the defendant.The court heard that in 1994, the parent company of CCHK and a business partner jointly invested in a property development project and capital injection was made by CCHK. CCHK subsequently intended to withdraw some of the investment fund from the project but the two parties failed to reach a final agreement. Since 2018, CCHK and the business partner had a dispute over the project. The defendant was assigned to resolve the dispute.The defendant subsequently arranged a one-on-one meeting with a director-cum-shareholder of the business partner. During the meeting, the defendant told the director-cum-shareholder that he was in urgent need of money for his personal financial problem, and solicited from the latter a bribe between $2 million and $3 million. The defendant claimed that he would assist the director-cum-shareholder to resolve the dispute on terms and conditions most favourable to him, but his solicitation was rejected.…/2CCHK prohibits its employees from soliciting or accepting advantages from others in relation to CCHK’s affairs and business.CCHK and the business partner concerned rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by prosecuting counsel Marc Corlett, assisted by ICAC officer Swing Chan. 09
Jun 2025Three months’ jail for foreman of airport expansion works subcontractor charged by ICAC for soliciting and accepting bribes from bar-bendersA foreman of a subcontractor of the Terminal 2 expansion works of the Hong Kong International Airport, charged by the ICAC, was today (June 9) sentenced to three months’ imprisonment at the West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts for soliciting and accepting bribes totalling about $16,000 from three bar-benders for assisting them to continue their employment and assigning overtime work to one of them to earn extra payments.Ko Chun-yin, 31, then foreman of Ho Chau & Sons (HK) Engineering Limited (HCL), was sentenced to a jail term of three months and ordered to repay his then employer over $12,000 in restitution, equivalent to the amount of bribes involved in the present case.The defendant earlier pleaded guilty to two counts of agent soliciting an advantage and six counts of agent accepting an advantage, contrary to section 9(1)(a) of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance.In sentencing, Magistrate Mr Gary Chu Man-hon noted that the offences in the present case were serious in nature that they came as a blow to the local labour market, lowered workers’ morale and undermined Hong Kong’s clean reputation. The court had to send out a clear message to the public that the corrupt deserved severe punishment. The magistrate took a starting point of six months’ imprisonment and reduced the jail term of the defendant to three months having considered his guilty plea and immediate full restitution of the bribes concerned.The court heard that HCL was a subcontractor of the Terminal 2 expansion works of the Hong Kong International Airport at the material time. The defendant was a foreman of HCL responsible for leading a team of bar-benders and assigning work to them. Should workers be required to work overtime, they would be paid 1.5 to two times of the standard hourly rate. HCL prohibited its employees from soliciting or accepting any advantages from others in relation to its business and affairs.Between April 2022 and February 2023, the defendant had respectively solicited from three bar-benders bribes of $100 per working day or an unspecified amount of “tea money” for assisting them to continue their employment with HCL. During the period, the defendant had eventually accepted bribes totalling $6,800 from the trio.The defendant had also solicited from one of the bar-benders bribes of $200 per working day for arranging him to perform overtime work to earn extra payments.The bar-bender reluctantly paid bribes totalling about $6,000 to the defendant for his overtime work on 30 working days.The ICAC investigation stemmed from a corruption complaint. Enquiries revealed that the workers believed that the defendant had the authority to dismiss them. The trio reluctantly paid bribes to the defendant as they worried about losing their jobs. One of the workers was dismissed on the spot after he refused to pay a bribe of $3,000 solicited by the defendant.HCL rendered full assistance to the ICAC during its investigation into the case.The prosecution was today represented by ICAC officer Moon Leung.