![ICAC](resources/images/icac_logo.png)
![HKBEDC](resources/images/hkbedc_logo.png)
Model
Establish the relevant facts and identify the ethical issues at stake
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_10a.png)
Materials still meet safety standard
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_10b.png)
Exercising discretion
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_10c.png)
Completing the project on time
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_10d.png)
Long term friendship and business partnership
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_10e.png)
Horse-racing club membership
Model
Have an objective assessment of each stakeholder's position
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_12a.png)
Leslie
- should discharge his duty properly and professionally
- is personally obliged to help Anson
- can get a horse-racing club membership with Anson’s assistance
- may breach professional code and law if he accepts Anson’s offer
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_12b.png)
Anson
- suffers financial difficulties
- may commit an offence for offering bribe
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_12c.png)
Leslie's company and its client
- should perform its role properly in overseeing the project
- may suffer monetary loss and reputational damage for project delay
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_12d.png)
General public
- Public safety is at stake
Model
Identify viable alternatives and their effects on the stakeholders
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_13a.png)
Option 1
- Accept Anson’s offer
- Ignore Anson’s change of materials
- Approve Anson’s inflated monetary claims
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_13b.png)
Option 2
- Turn down Anson’s offer
- Ignore Anson’s change of materials
- Approve Anson’s inflated monetary claims
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_13c.png)
Option 3
- Decline Anson’s applications
- Reject Anson’s offer
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_13d.png)
Option 4
- Decline Anson’s applications and offer
- Provide proper assistance to Anson
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_13e.png)
Other options
Model
Select the best course of action
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19a.png)
Option 1:
- Accept Anson’s offer
- Ignore Anson’s change of materials
- Approve Anson’s inflated monetary claims
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19a1.png)
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19b.png)
Option 2:
- Turn down Anson’s offer
- Ignore Anson’s change of materials
- Approve Anson’s inflated monetary claims
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19a1.png)
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19c.png)
Option 3:
- Decline Anson’s applications
- Reject Anson’s offer
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19b1.png)
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19d.png)
Option 4:
- Decline Anson’s applications and offer
- Provide proper assistance to Anson
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19b1.png)
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19e.png)
Other options
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_19c1.png)
Best Choice for Leslie
Professional/ Company code
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_20a.png)
Professional obligations
Legal requirements
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_20b.png)
Prevention of Bribery Ordinance
Uncompromising self-values
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_20c.png)
Honesty, integrity and responsibility
Sunshine test
![](resources/images/architects/m1_s4/architects_m1_s4_20d.png)
Decision that can be openly discussed